Thursday 10 May 2012

Week 11: Black Death


Jarrah James, Bella Rogers, Caitlin Graham and Kaitlyn Patterson

The flourishing urban civilisation prior to the Black Death in 1348 was based upon the growing economic prosperity that can be found in Italy, in particular Florence and Venice which would come to be capitals of the Renaissance to come.  However powerful and influential these two cities were, both relied and built their economies on different foundations. Florence built repute through the establishment of an effective banking system that allowed for growth through the merchants and guilds. The close relationship between the leaders of Florence and the papacy meant greater military and political support and also allowed for the newly improved banking system to ‘act as the pope’s fiscal (tax) agent. This action allowed some merchant companies to grow and transform into the banking profession. 

The second economic growth industry in Florence at this time was in wool. Wool in Florence within this period is described as the most luxurious and expensive of commodities. The trade prices on wool allowed for the industry to expand, encompassing a larger amount of the population and lowering unemployment rates, due the arduous production processes. 

Unlike Florence, Venice did not find its economic niche in wool. The Venetian industry was built on trade, which during this period relied heavily upon the construction of ships and administration of fleets.  Through this industry Venice was able to gain independence from the Byzantine Empire by 1000.

The flourishing urban civilisation of the proto-Renaissance era can also be seen through the expansion of population in and around Florence and Venice, through the construction of public spaces and buildings such as churches, guildhalls, government buildings, palaces, hospitals, walls, and roads. These constructions were erected to match the growing prosperity among the merchant classes. In particular, walls highlighted the growing city population as walls were built to replace the pre-existing roman boundaries which had served as security up until this time. 

Florence wall construction c.600-1284
 
Francis or Francesco Petrarch (1304-1374) is a perfect example of the blossoming of the Renaissance thought in the ‘cultural explosion’ prior to the Black Death.  He was a noted scholar, as well as poet whose extensive body of work was significant in the development of European literature. What makes Petrarch the ideal Renaissance man is his study of classical antiquity; he reflects on the past to promote social reform for the future. 

Petrarch
 
In the extract letter to Posterity, Petrarch displays a then unique exploration of human thought and mind, in particular an exploration of himself, which was a new approach in the literary world. Petrarch’s letter adopts a humble and self-conscious tone; he is both expressing hopefulness that his legacy will live on through his work, and also modesty, as he recognises that as one man, he is insignificant in the greater scheme of things. This critical self-analysis is only one of his many works, however it shows a new development in expression of thought.  It furthermore provided the intellectuals of later generations with inspiration, for the examination of oneself in order to produce moral judgement became popular amongst scholars. 




Venice was originally under Byzantine rule until it gained independence when the Byzantines lost control of the area in the 9th  century. Venice’s economy was primarily based on mercantile trade, and  the building of ships, to the extent that the state funded the construction of trade convoys, and the most powerful merchants were those involved in the running of the state. In 1279 the Grand Council, made up of the city’s wealthy founding families, voted to close membership, turning the merchant elite into heredity noblemen. While any Venetian was free to make money to the degree that his or her skill allowed, excepting a few select instances, all were barred from taking part in the instrument of government unless born to it. And yet, there was little objection or resistance to this, unlike in Florence...

Florence was run by nine priori, each elected for two-month terms. Six were from the major guilds, and the remaining three were chosen from among the minor guilds. These guilds each dedicated to a given trade,
counted a large portion of the working Florentine population among their members – but not all of them. The Ciompi, labourers and wool-workers of varying skill employed by the wool merchants’ guild, but not actually members, could take no part in civic decision-making. They rose up in rebellion in 1378, compelling the Oligarchs to give them guild and citizen rights. The ciompi priori attempted to affect political change from office, but a few months later the traditional guilds took up arms, and dissolved the new ciompi guilds.
Jurists, or specialists in Roman law, the basis for many law codes throughout Italy, came to prominence in the 11th and 12th centuries, as they helped found the laws of the developing communes. Some individuals, Marsilius of Padua and Bartolus of Sassoferato, also contributed significantly concepts of political theory in the 12th and 13th centuries.


14th century Venice


The Black Death had an enormous impact on medieval society, primarily because of a huge loss of population. Although the number of deaths due to the Black Death is disputed, King estimates is as between one and two thirds of the population throughout Western Europe. This significant loss of life had a profound impact on the economy, as a huge number of labourers had been killed, leaving positions vacant. This saw an increased demand for workers, and a consequential rise in the average wage of the peasants. It also significantly impacted on the feudal system, as lords found themselves without tenants to cultivate their land, and the costs of rent dropped dramatically as a result. As you can imagine, without the workers to tend the land, there was a marked drop in the production of agricultural goods, and the revenue accrued.

The nature of the plague meant society was literally helpless to resist it. Medicine was not of the standard required to combat the plague, and the methods of prevention were often far-fetched and fanciful. Loss of population meant many homes and even cities were abandoned, with the occupants having either fled or perished. Furthermore, because of such exposure to death, society became rather blasé the sight of it. In a first had account written by Agnolo Di Tura, he wrote that: “There were none that wept for any death, for everyone expected to die. And so many died, that everyone thought it to be the end of the world.”

Monks with plague, late 14th century illuminated manuscript
 
Whilst the Black Death has significant social and economic impact, it was not the sole causative factor in the end of the medieval era and the beginning of the renaissance era. As evidenced by Florence and Venice, the social reform of the renaissance was already occurring in a pre-plague Europe. The historian Joseph Byrne sums this concept up nicely when he states; “the Black Death…was much more of a catalyst of change in the West than an instigator of it.”















 A plague doctor. The mask was based on a popular theory of the time that the plague was carried by infected, bad air. This mask apparently filtered the air, thus enabled proximity to the infected. 










Blog question: in your opinion, did the Black Death merely enhance the significant change already occurring in the late medieval era, or did it have its own independent social and economic consequences?

8 comments:

  1. According to the readings Europe had been prosperous, there had been a significant increase in wealth and a real development of society particularly in the area of arts. However the Black Death saw a significant change in the community, not only was there a real loss of the population, for example Florence had had a population of between 90,000 to 100,000 prior to the Black Death but afterwards their population had fallen to only 30,000 people, but after the Plague there was a significant increase in the cost of living as despite the decreased need for produce, there had also been a significant decrease in the number of workers. 

    Occupations, even Priesthood had become a lot less appealing and they had struggled to try and replace the positions, especially during the Plague season. However after the Plague, as the cost of living and especially luxury items, had doubled, if not more, 'the price of labour and the work of all trades and crafts rose in disorderly fashion beyond the double' (Matteo Villani). Famines also occurred after this period of time. 

    In my opinion the Black Death had had a really negative effect on the European society and it was not just the social and economic consequences but also the emotional effects, as there had been so many losses of lives, and an idea that emerged through many accounts was the mentality that arose, being that despite the relationships that people had had with each other prior, life became about ones own survival. 

    After what Europe had gone through, it was only natural that their society had been changed in a drastic way. 

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good afternoon,

    I would agree with Lauren and say that the Black Death had consequences of its own.
    Firstly, as Lauren said, the population decrease changed the face of europe. Some cities were almost abandonned because of the number of deads. Moreover, some movments of population are mentioned in the readings.

    Secondly, it must have had enormous economic consequences. During the waves of death, the economic life was disrupted. Therefore, commerce and traderoutes may have been damaged. Also production, whether of agricultural or consummer goods, must have dropped.
    Because of the shrinkage of the population, in the aftermath of the Black Death, wages increased and labor was highly valued. Maybe it changed the economic organisation as well. Because the lords had to try hard to keep the remaining peasants in their land instead of going somewhere else to find a better wage. Maybe the ties between lord and peasants got stricter (?).

    Thirdly, maybe the Black Death shake the legitimity of the authorities (?) If the plague was seen as a punishment from God because of bad behaviour, maybe the survivors questionned the overall organisation of the society. I wonder how the Black Death affected the mindset of the people. Indeed, they were in a prosperous society, with commerce, money and flourishing art, it seems it was ‘perfect’. Suddenly, the Black Death happened and reminded people how fragile their situation is ...
    In the readings, it is indicated that some people turned away from ‘good christian behavior’ and enjoyed life all they could. Maybe the Black Death led to a questioning of the authority of the Church (?) because it was unable to provide answers or even help.

    Lastly, according to the readings, a special kind of art, related to the Black Death emerged.

    I apologize for the lack of clarity of my post,
    Amandine

    (PS : it seems that in the readings, Margaret King argues that the Black Death was just an interruption in the emergence of a flourishing society, a pause before the ‘renaissance’ continued its development. But I wonder if the Black Death didn’t help the Renaissance ... Even if the prices of goods skyrocketed, one may argue that some people got richer thanks to the rise on prices (?) If it is the case, maybe it means that some ressources were available for art mecenes (?) All the more because people wanted to enjoy life after their hardship.
    Also I wonder if because people realised that their society had lacuna in their knowledge (medecine for example) or because their period was so depressing, they didn’t naturally turn to the classical authors ... a kind of ‘back to basics’.
    Moreover, it may be far-fetched, but could we argue that the ‘individualistic’ mentality that arose was the compost on which the Renaissance idea of man emerged ? During the Renaissance, the universe is centered around men, not god anymore ... could we say that the Black Death challenge the place of God as the center of everything, opening the path for the Renaissance ?
    It is just that the Black Death seems to have shaken the late medieval society so much that it is hard to believe it didn’t had tremendous consequences, some good as well as bad ones).

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Black Death was far too great a calamity to be described as merely enhancing already occurring change. It certainly had dramatic economic and social consequences. The immense loss of life created economic havoc in both the urban centres and countryside, leaving all industry and food production affected. Despite a few capitalising on the vastly reduced workforce by working for increased wages, the majority of the economic structure would have been at the point of collapse. Imagine the loss of labourers, skills, experienced merchants, artisans, teachers and much more. It is almost inconceivable that Florence's population finally exceeded its pre-Black Death numbers in the nineteenth century!

    I also imagine the social ramifications were profound. People had become numb with the horror and loss; the psychological reactions manifested in a variety of ways, such as the self-destructive ("drinking beyond measure and limit"), the opportunistic ("making free use" of abandoned property) or the mentally paralysed. Crucially, the people ceased relating as a caring community: citizens avoided one another and neighbours ignored each other, to say the least. Given the recurrence of the plague over more than five decades, this loss of community interaction must have had enormous impact.

    After the significant period of artistic endeavour that preceded the plague, the interruption to the art and literature is viewed differently by individuals. Boccaccio deemed it to have spurred on a freer approach, "art for art's sake" as opposed to the earlier art for Christian sake. However it has been proposed that in fact it returned to the conservative style of an earlier time. Nonetheless, it is revealing that a "pause" occurred before the gradual emergence of "new literary figures" - perhaps evidence of the disruption to the communities of intellectuals and teachers needed to pass on their skills. It is also enlightening to consider the emergence of 'humanism' after this catastrophic event - when the fear finally abated, the beliefs of Christianity and in God were being 'sidelined' and a new appreciation for intellectual self-determination was on the rise.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I personally don't think that the black plague was small enough to be considered merely a catalyst of social change. regardless of the social reform which had begun in europe, the plagues effects were far too far reaching to be considered anything more than an instigator for an enourmous societal upheaval.

    quite literally everything was affected by the plague in drastic ways, the widespread death caused huge changes in the population and their distribution; the abandonment of cities, the drastically reduced populace etc. This also had extravagant effects upon the economy, causing the prices of goods and lodging to rise sharply due to the more or less total crash of the economy due to the damage the plague did to nearly all forms of industry immediately following a period of relative prosperity.

    not to mention the plague plunging society into an emotionally dead state. the way the deaths of the plague are described makes me think these people were living in a sort of purgatory, devoid of hope, waiting for death, totally desensitised to everything happening around them, as well as any sense of unity between people being severely damaged by the effects of the plague.

    to me, all of this just seems far to great a change in society to be seen as the straw that broke the camels back, so to speak

    ReplyDelete
  5. The bubonic plague that swept Europe considerably amplified the outcomes of a declining society. While more gruesome and rapid than a society on the descent, it similarly resulted in shortening the lives of many within Europe, dropping birth rates and a massive economic downturn. People were dying, less people were getting borne and trade ceased to a great degree in order to isolate the disease. It did, however, result in several consequences that a society crumbling under its own weight did not illicit. Perhaps most importantly was the plagues indiscriminate nature, resulting in people from all classes - be it the wealthy, poor or clergy - facing their demise in the face of pestilence. No one could explain this phenomenon, not even the church, and as such their power was questioned and their teachings challenged

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree that the Black Death was far too big a factor as to be considered as merely enhancing the changes already occurring. The effects of it were drastic – especially the loss of lives – and had consequences of its own that affected society. With the sudden decrease in population, labour costs went up and economy and trade were undoubtedly affected, by fear if nothing else. Religious beliefs were also being questioned, as (pointed out by Ryan), the Plague did not discriminate who it took, and people were beginning to doubt a God that did not save them as they had believed he would. In my opinion, the Black Death was one of the important factors that influenced the changes in society rather than just an enhancement of those already happening.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The Black Death, in many respects, acted to accelerate the decline of the Medieval era, and to instil new ideals. The Renaissance ideal of individual knowledge was already in circulation, as mentioned in the blog post. Petrarch was one example of this literary change. This exploration of self can be considered, perhaps, as an example of a society beginning to qustion their religion; where before all focus was upon God, now individuals were beginning to question and explore their own place. The occurance of the plague can, in this light, be considered to have accelerated this process. In a world where clergy were not safe, inhabitants questioned the role of God, and His validity.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I cannot thank Mr Benjamin service enough and letting people know how grateful I am for all the assistance that you and your team staff have provided and I look forward to recommending friends and family should they need financial advice or assistance @ 1,9% Rate for Business Loan .Via Contact : .  247officedept@gmail.com. WhatsApp...+ 19893943740. Keep up the great work.
    Thanks, Busarakham.

    ReplyDelete