Thursday 12 April 2012

Week 7 : Relics and Devotional Life - Medieval Men and Women

The medieval vision of women and understanding of gender relations are heavily shaped by religious teachings. Christian theologists saw women as inferior to men and dangerous creatures. The mainstream justification comes from Eve and her bad behaviour. 

Adam and Eve, Lucas Cranach the Elder, 1533.  
 
Eve is presented as created from Adam’s rib, therefore she comes second and is inferior to men. Furthermore, she is the sinner who listened to the devil and pushed Adam to sin as well. Consequently, she is seen as subjected to evil influence, a temptress and a danger for men. So are all women, “daughters of Eve”. Therefore, men must have authority over women. During the medieval period, for women one of the most important facts of their lives was virginity. Virginity was an expectation in young women and something which was only to be broken after their marriage to a suitable candidate. St Jerome stated that ‘the gift of virginity has been bestowed most richly upon women’ and a women who gave this away out of wedlock was committing a major sin. Thus marriage became a very important institution to the church. Again, Jerome believed that ‘wedded women may congratulate themselves that they come next to virgins’, and played an important role in repopulating a society. However, it was also believed by some (for example Augustine of Hippo) that marriage was only for the purpose of procreating children, and for that to be done in a decent manner which discouraged sin.

Marriage of Bohemond I and Constance of France, 1337
 
Within marriage, women had no authority over their body, but were seen to be owned by their husband. Marriage was an oath of peace, and was often used to create alliances between feuding families; it was a form of truce. The marriages of upper class women were always made to the advantage of the family. They had very little control in their own lives; they didn’t have any standing of their own, it was their father’s standing and then their husbands which control their own.  A dowry was also of key importance in marriages and without a large dowry a woman could not expect to find a desirable marriage. There were many expectations and pressures placed upon females throughout the Middle Ages. From all levels of society, reproduction and the caring of family was clearly emphasised as not only an essential aspect of their lives but additionally it was considered the dual purpose of a woman. Women were blamed for any infertility, regardless of whether it was their body which was capable of bearing a child or not. Engendering valid heirs was a challenge faced by women as mortality rates were increasingly high. Therefore, despite the average woman giving birth to approximately ten children, death was frequent and sadly unsurprising.
Medieval women and children
 Failing to full fill the role of motherhood reflected negatively not only on the essence of the female but in turn both families with which she was significantly tied. Women were also expected to govern her servants (if she had any), maintain the household and above all, always remain obedient to the will of her husband, putting aside her own aspirations and desires. An upper Class woman was very much the pawn of her family. Upper class women rarely had any access to what was considered “their” land or money; it normally went straight to her husband so she had no economic role what so ever. 

Women defending a Castle, Walter de Milemete, 1326-27 
 The main role of an upper class woman was to have several children with a strong male lineage. Much like a working class woman, upper class women had to control her husband’s household; it was her job to control the servants and oversee the everyday order in the household. Working class women were the backbone of a medieval society. They provided clothes and cooked food for their families and village. Working class women usually worked from dawn to dusk, doing jobs similar to famers; feeding the animals, harvesting the crops, as well as maintaining the house. On top of their housewife duties, they sometimes help their husbands in the fields that enabled him to make money and be the “bread winner”. 
Women in the fields - Haymaking in June
 
Another type of working class woman was the urban woman. She helped her merchant husband sell goods to different towns and travel with him as well. Though as the bible gives as a very inferior and weak model of woman, it is obviously from the readings, that women in the Middle Ages were not as weak and inferior as the bible and its preachers had us believe.

In Medieval Europe the church was the sole provider of education for its people. As such the church’s views on women led their educational status. What little education they did receive was usually in accordance with views of their future roles as wives and mothers. Matteo Veggio in his treatise De educatione liberorum written in 1440, claimed that women should lead "regular, chaste, and religious lives and to devote all [their] time to female labors." Noble daughters were educated by private tutors along with their brothers in many houses holds.

Alternatively women could enter the church as nuns in an Abbey or Nunnery. Education was a part of a Nuns training and the nunnery endeavoured to form an independent and self supporting community. Much like the male monasteries the Nuns life was devoted to worship and prayer, living under the same codes of chastity, humility and loyalty as their male counterparts. However the Nunnery was the only place where medieval women were offered some freedom. They were able to elect their own abbess of prioress and this was one of the few positions of authority that Medieval women held. 

Life in the Nunnery was for self-contained and isolated from the outside world as it was its own farm, shelter, hospital and school. The nuns were involved heavily in charity such as healing the sick and feeding the poor who came to their doors. The convents and nunneries were the only source of education for women, although the knowledge the nuns were given with was carefully screened by the Church.

Matthew Bull, Louise Giorgini, Tekla Kirby, Georgia Maling, Amandine Martel, and Amber Waring-Thomson.

Question for Blog Discussion:
Interestingly enough, in spite of the Church’s bad vision of women, it fostered improvements in the status/condition of women in the middle ages, what are they ?

12 comments:

  1. The Church preached the virtues of marriage and fidelity which, in effect, raised the status of a married woman or one who remained a virgin until her marriage. These women were to be treated as 'good women' and 'holy' - a form of protection. A woman who 'gave herself to God' was 'the King's wife' - the aid and protection afforded to nuns is evidence of this. The influence of Joan of Arc and the support readily given to her by the knight Sir Robert de Baudricourt and King Charles, along with the fame and exaltation of the people, demonstrates the high status of a female when her connection was to God. Secondly, Virgin Mary the mother of Jesus was revered as having delivered God to mankind: "life has come through Mary" - a woman to be cherished!
    The education made available to women through the Church also empowered them; some were capable of rising to a position of authority (abbess) or be literate enough to write the biography of a King! Saint Scholastica, Christine de Pisan, St Clare, Queen Radegund and women of similar capabilities would have acted as inspirational examples to other women. Christine de Pisan was very impressive!

    ReplyDelete
  2. In the male dominated society of the Middle Ages, despite the opinion that the Church had of women, they were still being educated and were the child bearers. They were expected to be in control of the household and this gave them quite a bit of power, even though the males were still the public face of the house.
    As well as these factors, women were also able to take up positions within the orders of the Church as Nuns and Abbess'.
    Women that remained virgins until they were married, and remained faithful, also held a lot of power as they had maintained the beliefs so firmly upheld by the Church. The Church was extremely critical of women, so if a woman were to lead a life that followed all of the guide lines as stipulated by the Church, they were able to lead a life relatively free of scrutiny.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well, the church frowned on slavery of Christians, so there's that...

    And, well, obviously, they were permitted to take /some/ roles of moderate power within the church, as Nuns or Abesses.

    ReplyDelete
  4. While the church may have contributed greatly to the suppressed status of women over a great period of the middle ages due to its representation of eve as a temptress and a sinner, it also offered them ample means to bolster their status. While women were traded almost as a commodity to be wed to that who would upgrade the social standing of themselves and the name of the family, if those women were married as virgins they were seen as being pure, thus alleviating the stigma of being sinful. This could also be achieved through living a life devoted to prayer, through which women could become nuns or abbesses, again, making them more highly respected figures. It was not only the church who influenced the status of women, however. With the development of towns and the birth of mercantile and artisan lifestyles, women were liberated from their traditional gender roles, to an extent, and able to assist their husband in crafting or selling wares. And while it was often only the men who were admitted to join the various guilds within a town, women became more respected in the versatility of their capabilities

    ReplyDelete
  5. Despite the Church’s negative view of women, education was still given to women during this time. Some even were able to reach high-ranking positions through monastic life. As the Church also placed a high value on marriage and fidelity, and the ones who remained virgin until marriage, or indeed for life (if they entered the monastery) were viewed as ‘good’ and should be protected and cherished. Furthermore, they are the child-bearers, which was also something they were respected for - without the women, there would be no sons/heirs. They also held domestic power, as generally it was the women who ruled the household, though the men are considered the public face of it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Women during this time were given 'in some cases' high positions in society, which potentially was caused by upperclass education of women. The church saw women who maintained virginity until marriage with high esteem, this showed women as pure beings without sin as long as the stayed loyal to their husband and their marital contract. Females could become abbesses our nuns to either erase sin by constant prayer, or become serving a life of solitude towards the church. These abbesses and nuns, much like the few educated women were given a high role in the church, causing a slight improvement toward women of the time.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The church in the middle ages was more successful in emphasising the inferior status of females than anything else, however it did enable some improvement to the status and conditions of medieval women.
    It is correct that education was offered to women by the church; a woman could become a nun in an abbess and some even became notable scholars. Furthermore, they were given the chance of obtaining status and reputation in society through portraying immense religious devotion and piety; as is the case with Scolastica.
    By following the laws of the church in relation to virginity, marriage and fidelity, a woman could maintain her status in society, and in some cases, improve it (a marriage to a man of higher position would improve a woman's status)
    However it cannot be assumed that all women of medieval society had such opportunities. In the majority of cases, it was only those of a wealthy, reputable background that actually had access to education. The peasant females were still required to work in the fields and the domestic setting of the household, obtaining little improvement in conditions.

    Caitlin

    ReplyDelete
  8. Although women largely remained subservient to their husband's, at times conditions did favour the women themselves. Those of privileged families had access to education as part of a vocation to God and they served in monasteries as nuns and even Abbesses. Although women would often marry into families of lesser social status, the opposite could occur and a woman would find herself in a new higher social allegiance. Finally on a more androgynous level, women like men were expected to plow fields and run households.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This question must be some type of late April’s fool joke! The Church in no way influenced or helped increase women’s rights or power during medieval times. Although it could be argued that the church created convents which helped women have ownership of their lives I would strongly disagree. To begin with most women had no choice in whether they attend the convent, they were after all subjects of their fathers will, quite convenient if you have a family that is too large and you want one less mouth to feed, send her to the convent, don’t stress god will feed her. Oh and let’s not forget how free she will be in the convent. She will be free to pray… make some internal leadership decisions and have plenty of time to do gods work. Strangely as it may seem the Nuns have no rights, they are ruled by mens will (Check Benedict or even God) they must work for their master and cannot leave, unless of course they want to forfeit their soles and live an eternity in hell. Interestingly the Christian movement suggests it has abolished slavery, yet it enslaves all women of Christian belief. Easy to see that Church enslaves Nuns, they’re not free, they have a master , they have strict rules and must adhere to them or lose their sole, sounds like a great place. I suppose a women could live a better life outside a convent, she could be enslaved to a man, either her husband or her father. What right would she have to complain ? She is after all a mere product of Adams rib cage…. Oh and Eve was an evil sinful women and therefore all women after her should be punished! (Just in case you missed it I was being sarcastic). The notion of virginity being a power that women held is utter crap, if virginity was so powerful then why weren’t the men made to uphold such values? It was only a method of controlling women and making them out to be there for the man’s personal use. If anyone thinks virginity is a power, spare a thought for how powerful the woman would have felt on her wedding night, when the man took what was his, how could be grudge him this pleasure? After all it was gods will!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a strong position Shawn and thanks for engaging so clearly. Nonetheless as a historian it is often useful to be able see the motivations for behaviours that we now find unacceptable, so can you see any improvements at all for women (remember you can consider women of any class)? Anyone from the blog team for this week want to consider this response?

      Delete
    2. Nun may not sound like a desirable carrier for us now, but at the time there was 3,5 major advantage to be a nun. Firstly you would benefit the relative security of the nunnery walls. Secondly, your social standard would be higher than other normal women. The reason being that virgins, nuns, mystics were highly regarded or at least respected. You need to put yourself in the medieval mind and you may realise that a religious carrier at the time was considered as the best, the “purest” thing you could do. And I think that in a society were everything is public, what people think of you is important and have great influence over your everyday life. Therefore, being a respected nun could be rewarding. Thirdly, you wouldn’t have to go through the danger of repeated childbearing. The last “half advantage” is that you may have more access to education even if it is only religious texts.

      When we asked the question, the main element we had in mind concerned marriage. The sacramentalisation of marriage by the Church can definitely be seen as an improvment for 3 reasons. Firstly, marriage was now officialy a consent between spouses instead of a transaction between fathers. You may argue that in reality nobody would ask the spouses (whether bride or groom) but there are law record of marriages (see Emilie Amy’s book) being declared invalids because it had been done against one of the spouse will. Secondly, divorce was nearly forbidden. It brings stability for women, their position was not as precarious as it use to be. In my opinion, this is a great improvment. You may also note the relative equality preached by the church concerning marriage and divorce (husband’s body belongs to the wife and vice versa ; the reasons for womam to ask for a divorce were the same than men’s one for example). Thirdly, the church’s strong opposition to polygamy (maybe the women was the slave of her husband, to use your words, but at least she was the only one).

      I would also draw your attention to the fact that the Church also provided “good” role model for women (like Virgin Mary or Mary Magdalena for example). All the more after the 11th century when the cult of teh Virgin Mary boomed dramatically. In a society dominated by men, I think it could be a relief to have such a strong feminine figure to look up to.

      Delete
  10. Although the teachings of the Church granted women no official status (ie:the "three-part scheme"-Klapish-Zuber), it did theoretically aid the social conditions of women in the Middle Ages. The rituals of marriage-which became a significant and necessary ceremonial process-was established by the Church. The process granted greater weight to the union, providing public evidence. The sheer solemnity (and public nature) of the official union may have aided the Church in preaching, and upholding fidelity. The union of a man and woman became more than just a familial monopoly move; the marriage became a more meaningful concept.
    The Church also attempted to promote exogamy within marriages; the fact that women were not to be married to, for example, cousins, solely for the purpose of holding family wealth or title, perhaps lessned the view of women as simply a marital object. That said, wealth and connection were still manipulated through marriage by the families, only, women were now handballed off to those outside the immediate family cirle.
    The Church did not promote feminism. It did not attempt to modernise Biblical teachings of the inferiority of women, nor did it attempt to grant women any rights that may have jeopardized the position of men. However, by establishing public marriage ceremonies, and by promoting exogamy over incestuous marriages, the Church did succeed in improving the social conditions of medieval women.

    ReplyDelete